Promenade homeowners have contributed substantial assessments to BRMA over the years, yet Lot D—despite being annexed into BRMA's common-area framework—was allowed to deteriorate significantly under their watch.

After years of BRMA control over Lot D, the current BRMA Board spent approximately $25,000 of association funds advancing a legal position that BRMA is not responsible for the area. Regardless of the ultimate legal outcome, Promenade is now left contending with landscape depletion, erosion, fire risk, liability concerns, and significant restoration obligations.

Because Promenade remains part of BRMA, their decisions such as putting a wire fence on common area hillsides negatively impacts aesthetics and our property values. We cannot simply opt out. That is why it is critical that Promenade has a seat at the table and meaningful representation on the BRMA Board.

Should Promenade be expected to shoulder the restoration burden without corresponding financial support?